Michael Neal

Hometown:

Whitby Ontario

Currently Playing In:

Pro

Birthday:

1989-04-03

Position:

LW

Eligible for draft:

2007

Shoots:

Left

Drafted:

2007

Height:

6-2

Acquired:

5th round (149th overall), 2007

Weight:

187 lbs.

Probability of Success
  • B

History

The younger brother of Stars prospect James Neal, Michael Neal possesses some of the same attributes as his older brother.

2006-07: He did not post great numbers in his second OHL season, scoring only four goals on his way to eight points in 52 games played. Part of the lack of production by Neal is a result of playing on a very talented and deep Belleville Bulls team.

2007-08: Missed the entire regular season with a knee injury.  Returned for the playoffs, but went pointless in seven games.

2008-09: Neal split time between the Belleville Bulls(OHL) and Sarnia Sting(OHL). He went pointless in 3 games with the Bulls, but scored 9 goals and added 12 assists in 63 games with Sarnia.

2009-10: Neal turned pro, splitting time with the Idaho Steelheads(ECHL) and Texas Stars(AHL). In 6 games with the Stars, Neal went pointless. In 57 games with Idaho, Neal scored 5 goals and added 10 assists.

2010-11: For the second straight season, Neal spent most of his time in the ECHL.  He tied his previous year’s total of 15 points in 2010-11.  He did notch his first career AHL point during his 16 games in the AHL – totaling three goals in all.  He was held scoreless in eight ECHL postseason games.

Talent Analysis

Neal is a physically imposing forward like his older brother, James.  His skating is above average for a player his size and he does his best work along the boards.  Plays a clean and fairly industrious game.  Craves physical play.  Has a tremendous off-ice work ethic and keeps himself in tiptop shape.  Doesn’t possess any sort of mesmerizing talent and is still very raw.  Lost a crucial year of development due to a knee injury that sidelined him for an entire season.  Will have to overcome a lot to be considered a legitimate NHL prospect.  Needs to find a niche and become exceptional at it in order to become a valuable asset to his team.

 

Future

Appears to be a fringe AHL player at this point and may spend another year in the ECHL while competing for AHL call-ups.

 

Bryan Allen’s future

by Scott McFarlane
on

Here is a look at Bryan Allen, a well known Canucks prospect.

Bryan Allen was drafted by the Canucks in the 1998 NHL entry draft in the first round, #4 overall.

Allen is a big guy, listed at 6’4 weighing in at around 215 pounds. Allen has the potential to be a Chris Pronger like defenceman, if he hadn’t of run into all those injuries. Remember the locker room one? Where he slipped on a bar of soap in the shower, and broke a bone in his ankle. Injuries like that have made the road to recovery a hard one for Bryan. So many injuries, in such a short amount of time. He has fought through all of the tough injuries, but still has the scars.

Allen had a very solid junior career, for the Oshawa Generals of the OHL. In his first season with Oshawa, he recorded 6 points in 60 games played. Not very good if you ask me. Every year since that year back in 1996-1997 he has improved greatly. The next season for Oshawa, Allen recorded 19 points in 48 games played, including an incredible 126 penalty minutes. His best season with the Canucks organization was last year with the Kansas City Blades, the farm team for the Canucks. Allen played in 75 games, before being called up by the Canucks. He recorded 25 points, and 99 penalty minutes. Then he was called up by the Canucks, and appeared in 6 games, where he was solid.

2000-01

Kansas-City Blades IHL GP 75 G 5 A 20 P 25 PIM 99

As for the future, I see Bryan Allen as a top 4 defenceman soon. He definitely has the tools to be a rock solid player. He just needs to gain NHL experience. Read more»

Canadiens’ Pre-Draft News Update

by Chris Boucher
on
Days before the NHL Entry Draft, and many Canadiens’ fans are already sitting on their hands in anticipation. The next two weeks will be chalk full of big news, so let’s take this opportunity to re-cap the most recent happenings in Hab-land.

Vadim Tarasov (7th round, 1999) has reportedly signed a two-year contract with the Canadiens. However, Montreal management has yet to announce the signing. Tarasov was named top goalie in Russia during each of the last 3 years. He finished last season with a 16-13-4 record, a 2.10 GAA, and a .912 save percentage. He’ll likely make his first official appearance in North America during the Canadiens’ prospect camp to be held in August.

The Canadiens will receive a compensatory pick for the loss of Shayne Corson via free-agency. The pick will fall in the fourth round (109th overall). The Corson pick gives the Habs a total of 10 picks in this year’s draft. They will pick 7th, 25th, 37th, 71st, 104th, 109th, 171st, 203rd, 235th, and 266th.

Add Tyler Hanchuk (3rd round, 2000), and Petr Chvojka (6th round 2000) to the list of former Hab draft picks re-entering this year’s NHL Draft. Unlike Dusty Jamieson (5th round, 1999), and Sean Dixon (6th round, 1999) who can re-enter the draft because they were unable to come to terms on a contract before the June 1st deadline, the Habs only had to offer a contract to Hanchuk and Chvojka in order to retain their rights. Not doing so is known in NHL circles as renouncing rights.

In related news Matt Carkner (2nd round, 1999) has reportedly signed a deal with the Read more»

Hockey’s Future will have three at 2001 Draft

by Bryan Taylor
on

There will be three Hockey’s Future writers attending the 2001 NHL draft including Bill Placzek(Blackhawks page), Mark Fischel (Panthers page), and Shane Malloy(Edmonton/Calgary pages). They will try their best to conduct as many interviews as possible with the selected draftees, so it should be another great year for Hockey’s Future on draft day.

HF Editor Mock Draft Results

by Bryan Taylor
on

Round 1

1. Atlanta - Ilja Kovalchuk 2. NY Islanders - Jason Spezza 3. Tampa Bay - Alexander Svitov 4. Florida - Stephen Weiss 5. Anaheim - Stanislav Chistov 6. Minnesota - Mike Komisarek 7. Montreal - Mikko Koivu 8. Columbus - Dan Hamhuis 9. Chicago - Dan Blackburn 10. NY Rangers - Tuomo Ruutu 11. Calgary - Fredrik Sjostrom 12. Nashville - R.J. Umberger 13. Edmonton - Pascal Leclaire 14. Phoenix - Jens Karlsson 15. Carolina - Carlo Colaiacovo 16. Vancouver - Chuck Kobasew 17. Toronto - Mark Popovic 18. Los Angeles - Colby Armstrong 19. Boston - Jeff Woywitka 20. San Jose - Tim Gleason 21. Pittsburgh - Lukas Krajicek 22. Buffalo - Ales Hemsky 23. Philadelphia - Doug Lynch 24. New Jersey (from STL) - Igor Knyazev 25. Montreal (from WSH) - Jiri Novotny 26. Dallas - Nathan Paetsch 27. Ottawa - Marcel Goc 28. New Jersey - Duncan Milroy 29. Chicago (from DET) - Greg Watson 30. Los Angeles (from COL) - Cory Stillman

Philadelphia Flyers draft preview

by Bill Meltzer
on

Going into the 2001 NHL entry draft, the Flyers organizational depth chart is lacking in quality prospects at every position except goaltender. There are a handful of forwards and defensemen with NHL potential in the system (such as defenseman Bruno St. Jacques and forward Alexander Drozdetsky) but there is nobody developing into a “can’t-miss” type of prospect.

It has been widely speculated that the Flyers will select a defenseman with the 23rd overall pick this year, because the team’s single biggest positional need is on defense, especially with the core of their sometimes-shaky NHL blueline starting to age. Names such as Tim Gleason, Lukas Krajicek, Mark Popovic, Fedor Tyutin, and Igor Knyazev have been bandied about as potential selections.

The Flyers could only hope that they had anything near the system type of depth and up front that they have in goal. After all, a team only needs two goalies, but they need twelve forwards and six defensemen. Unfortunately, going into the 2001-2002 season, most of the Flyers call-up players will probably continue to be minor league veterans such as Mark Greig. There is a chance that perhaps someone like Tomas Divisek or Vaclav Pletka could take a step forward and challenge for a spot with the big team, but that is far from a certainty.

The Flyers 2000 draft class almost exclusively featured the selection of forwards. This year, positional preference will tip otherwise balanced scales toward defenseman. That presents a wonderful opportunity– and a daunting challenge. Defense may be the single hardest position Read more»

Related Articles